Abused kids can’t really sue their parents

I recently searched online for the question of how an adult abuse survivor might go about suing his or her abusive parent. The results I got astounded me, but they shouldn’t have. I know my country wants parents abusing its kids. It makes this clear so many ways. This is just one more.

First, the cultural. Most of the search results lead to other people asking my question. The responses they get range from “You’d be much better off just getting therapy” (yes, because clearly all adult abused kids are well-to-do and can afford the extensive therapy required to get over the abuse) to “now you sit right down, you ungrateful shit, and list all the GOOD things your parent did for you, since obviously, having donated part of your zygote, this person loved you and you are an asshole” to things like this trip to the little shop of horrors, in which someone asks Yahoo: “Can i sue my parents because they hit me?”

Consider first what you did to contribute to the situation.

There is never a reason to strike another person, but, you could have very well pushed them to their limit.

Underlying all of this is the myth that every child who complains of having experienced poor parenting is obviously a spoiled shit who in fact had everything too easy and isn’t grateful for the massive self-sacrifices her zygote donor obviously made. Also underlying it is the assumption that such a suit would be revenge rather than justice. To which the abuse survivors explain that, no, they want to see the parent held accountable in some fashion. Publicly.

Another reason I can think of for suing would be to send a message to other abusive parents: you might get away with this while I’m under your control, but after that? Oh, yes, there could indeed be consequences.

The doublethink required here is extraordinary. I mean, you just know these people answering these question are all the same people who read about horrid abuse cases in the paper and think “hanging’s not good enough for those parents.” But when someone puts a face on it, when someone says “I was abused”, they go into denial. Why? Why do they automatically, unthinkingly assume the parent is the one being wronged?

It’s a bit like assuming every alleged rape is really just a case of some vicious bitch lying. Why not? We’re big on victim blaming.

Then I found some forum posters who claimed that in most states, you have until the age of 20 or 21 to sue an abusive parent. As far as I can tell, that’s generally true in the case of physical, non-sexual abuse, so if you were beaten as a child, you have until you’re a junior in college or your third year working at Burger King to hire that pricey attorney! Otherwise, the US is A-OK with what happened to you. Interestingly, sexual abuse often has a much longer statute – in some states, it’s up to the lifetime of the victim. Apparently emotionally abused kids can just go fuck themselves, since it’s very hard to document emotional abuse the way you can document wounds a doctor has seen. I realize there are other issues, like the problem of evidence, but for the law to blatantly suggest that sexual abuse is somehow worse than physical and emotional abuse is sending a very wrong message: all abuse is equally wrong in a moral sense.

Eventually, I found this forum, in which yet another person was asking the same question, but the respondents appear to be fellow abuse survivors. The questioner is 23 and can’t really function in life – agoraphobic (from the sound of it), unable to hold down a job, etc. All of this could easily be attributed to the abuse the person describes enduring. Here is my favorite response:

I have been doing a lot of research on the same topic for the past few day’s it seems to me that it is quite feasible although I would speculate that a lot of lawyers would not want to dirty their hands with such a case, there are as the other person who commented said; who see the sanctity of family as untouchable. As the threes of us, along with many others know; there is no sanctity in abuse.

Here, in a nutshell, is America’s concept of family values: we need babies, because babies become consumers who buy crap. We mustn’t allow anything to discourage people from making babies. It doesn’t matter if the babies are born addicted to something and grow up in a slum with no education, or they’re born to wealth and made to pay for it with sexual favors from an early age. It’s all good, because as long as they are eating and wearing clothes, businesses can make money off of these kids. That’s what America values.

And heaven forbid anyone check in with the adult children of the people making and supporting these laws.

Comments

  1. Pamela says

    I’m sorry i’m wrong the Medical Conciliation Panel is only if you’re suing a Doc for Malpractise.
    So no, you would not have to go through it if you were to sue your parents for mental health issues resulting from child abuse….You would only need solid evidence and a good attorney.

  2. Monte says

    Canada’s similar to the USA then. Even some the world’s most advanced democratic legal systems in the free world during this era in which we live, are not set up to protect or deal with children (of any age) born to and reared by Emotionally unfit parents and who, in the process have suffered lifelong Emotional/Psychological injuries from that prolonged exposure to such birth parents (which amounts to fucking psyche torture) are behind the times. Slow Political/Legal Change maintains the failing status quo.

    I’ve spent the last year in what I can only best describe as ‘Self Psycho Therapy.’ I’m still putting myself through this, for final self-resolution. [Such a thing is very difficult to do, and in the start, I didn't even know I was doin' it.] Emotionally unfit parents create dysfunctional birth families. If I can survive the process, I should document this self-preservation method I’ve come away with many conclusions that I’m sure apply to others. If someone were to now ask me today to define ‘Birth Family Implosion,’ do you know I could easily write an eye opening, easy reading Thesis on the topic? I’ve coined the term ‘Birth Family Implosion’ to distinguish and announce the real existence of Dysfunctional Birth Families that have managed to appear normal to the outside world for all intents and purposes, by cloaking it well.

    But, if you look deeper past the thin exterior, like a facade, the true dysfunction is lurking very close by. When the victim confronts ALL their closest relatives one-on one to force the truth to come out (in your own mind). You’ll never get the full truth, and consider yourself lucky if anyone ever offers a mere apology from the process, but you can get an abstract form of closure (like holding metaphorical funerals for the relationships that will need to be severed in the process). Perpetrators are being protected by one of three types 1/.Those in denial. Call them Blind loyalists. 2/. The ignorant/apathetic 3/. Those that have a ‘VESTED INTEREST to maintain the status quo’. Let call this type ‘The Paid Off’

    What is ‘Closure?’ I haven’t found it yet (but do not ever plan to bottle up my birth family pain ever again). Self Psycho-Therapy, or implementing such theoretical practices, takes day to day effort to find inner peace & in the face of ultimate lifelong psychological trauma stemming from many varied forms of Child Abuse (Emotional/Psychological, Physical, Sexual). The reality is that Canadian (& apparently American) law is WAY behind the times, and is cold and heartless in it’s own undefined ignorance. Afflictors/perpetrators rely on apathetic socially ignorant attitudes to get away with their actions.

  3. George M says

    Another year another drug.

    Recent escalating severe episodes caused me to go back to the shrinks once again to find a pill to help push the pain away. This time it was Nardil. Nardil is a member of the MAOI class of antidepressants. It helped push back the pain but it also shut down my libido 100%. MAOI’s used to be very popular before SSRI’s came out, but because they can induce high blood pressure in combination with cheese, they are usually a last-resort med.

    I needed a last resort med because SSRI’s trigger nasty weight gain for me. Being obese and stoned was not my idea of a good time.

    And I am lucky. My brother is permanently highly medicated for paranoid schizophrenia. He can’t hold down a job because even on heavy doses of anti-psychotic meds, he still periodically convinces himself he is a combination of Jesus and Philip of Macedonia.

    There is no history of schizophrenia in our family. His case was 100% induced by the child abuse we were both subjected to. With a mix of serious depression and bi-polar disorder, with a hefty dose of ADD thrown in, I consider myself well off. The reason I am so fortunate is because I am four years older and was slightly better suited to withstand the abuse that started when we were young children.

    The statute of limitations in New York State is 21 for child abuse, and as I am 46 now, this is long expired. Also 25 years ago this would have been laughed out of court anyways.

    So we can’t sue. Yet.

    What we might be able to do is band together and create a blacklist of the bastards that did this to us. If it becomes well known enough, people will examine it regularly as part of background checks. It could impact their credit scores, whether or not they get hired or tenure decisions.

    My stepfather, for example, is one nasty shit. He was one of the most cruel individuals I knew as a small boy growing up. To demonstrate what he would do to us if we stepped out of line, he would pick up furniture and smash it into splinters in front of us.

    Now here is the irony! This human colo-rectal biopsy is a CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST at a college famous for writing papers about parenting techniques. Let’s put this guy’s name on an abuser list and see who attends his lectures. What was the icing on the cake, he threw a tantrum at my biological father recently where Stepdad threatened to murder Dad, and left it on voicemail! So if he sees this and threatens to have it pulled, I can send a copy of the VM to his employers.

    And this is what really takes the cake. Of the four parents I was gifted with (2 biological, 2 step) he was actually the least harmful. When I have the stomache for it I will detail the really bad stuff.

    Thank you moderator for giving us a place to share.

    And what do you folks think? A national registry where we can list the abuser’s names?

    George M

  4. Jennifer Kesler says

    George M,

    I love the idea of a registry, but of course everyone involved would get sued for defamation. I think what’s really needed on this issue is a non-profit group that has the resources to find a good strategy. I.E., should we create a registry, knowing we’ll get sued, but make it happen in a way that it goes to the Supreme Court and gets a favorable ruling? Or should we push for legislation first?

    It’s a big, big problem that no one individual or small group thereof can correct. Some laws and some cultural values need changing.

  5. Scott says

    Interesting question i have asked many lawyer friends who didnt know the answer,,including a judge. One would think a victum of an assault no matter the perpetraitor( stranger or guardian) would be punishable,, we know a stranger can be made to pay monitary damages,, why not a parent? Anyone but your parents it seems is a no brainer,,,yes they can be made to pay and rightly so.. So why in the situation where it is blatant and doccumentable cant a parent, ,Isnt it a HUMAN right to be protected from harm no matter where the threat comes from? Why shouldnt the parent be made to pay for the therapy at least and financial support while the victim can be helped,, I realize that this type of thinking (justice) could cause major clogs in the justice channels with varying degrees of neglect and abuse buy why should a parent be able to keep thier finances (if any) while the victim suffers psycologicaly and with the inability to survive and support themselves. In other words the perpetrator goeson with thier lives and may have the financial ability while the victim suffers, The perpetrator should be responsible for the damages no matter the cost. Just because the system fears that winning asuit would cause shock waves and a flood of lawsuits doesnt make it ok to deny the right.. Its a HUMAN right as important as any to be protected equaly from and threat of harm , Even if the parents have nomoney they should be court ordered to pay restitution. Human rights are for all and all circumstances as long as they can be proven,, Surprised there hasnt been a high court ruling..This is not only for children,,
    I dont see how a parent can assault you as an adult and not be made accountable criminally and civily. made to pay pain and suffering damages…Will check with case law,,, anyone with the answer or knowing of a case,, let me know

  6. angry millenial says

    have reported my entire birth family to social services at some point.
    I encourage anyone who has encountered any sort of abuse to continue to do so. say it. say that it happened. they may not believe you, but at least you have not remained silent.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.